STRATEGIC PLAN 2005-2009PHONE:(985)857-3655 FAX:(985)857-3689
Vision StatementThe vision of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College is to improve the quality of life of our citizens through educational programs that provide our citizens the opportunity to learn in programs that are responsive to the needs of the citizens, business and industry, and other educational institutions of Louisiana. Mission StatementL. E. Fletcher Technical Community College is an open-admission, two-year public institution of higher education dedicated to offering quality, cost-effective, technical programs and academic courses to the citizens of South Louisiana for the purpose of preparing individuals for immediate employment, career advancement, and future learning. Philosophy StatementTo attain the mission of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College through utilizing the core values of student centered/learning centered programs at an institution dedicated to quality, responsiveness, diversity, flexibility, innovation, and collaboration with internal and external stakeholders. Goals and ObjectivesI. Goal: Increase Opportunities for Student Access and Success.Objective I.1: Increase fall 14th class day headcount enrollment at the L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College colleges by 93.6% from the fall 2003 baseline level of 630 to 1,220 by fall 2009. Louisiana: Vision 2020 Link: Objective 1.1 - To involve every citizen in the process of lifelong learning. Strategy I.1.1: Expand program and course offerings. Strategy I.1.2: Promote electronic (distance) learning activities. Strategy I.1.3: Promote transfers between and among campuses and colleges at all levels. Strategy I.1.4: Ensure access to programs and services to citizens with disabilities. Strategy I.1.5: Promote dual and cross enrollment agreements with public school districts and among postsecondary institutions. Strategy I.1.6: Use of Educational Planning and Assessment System (EPAS). Performance Indicators: Output: Number of students enrolled (as of the 14thclass day) at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College. Outcome: Percent change in the number of students enrolled (as of the 14th class day) at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College. Objective I.2: Increase fall 14th class day minority fall 14th class day headcount enrollment at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College by 85% from the fall 2003 baseline level of 176 to 326 by fall 2009. Louisiana: Vision 2020 Link: Objective 1.1 - To involve every citizen in the process of lifelong learning. Strategy I.2.1: Develop outreach programs to recruit minority students. Strategy I.2.2: Develop on-campus summer enrichment and transition programs. Strategy I.2.3: Increase hiring of minority administrators, faculty and staff. Strategy I.2.4: Expand various recruitment methods to increase participation in TOPS. Strategy I.2.5: Develop mentoring and tutoring programs. Performance Indicators: Output: Number of minority students enrolled (as of the 14th class day) at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College. Outcome: Percent change in the number of minority students enrolled (as of the 14th class day) at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College. Note: For the purposes of this report, minority enrollment is defined as any reported race, other than the following: white; non-resident alien; or "refused to indicate." Students reported as "non-resident aliens" and "refused to indicate" will not be included in the minority counts. Minority enrollment projections have been adjusted in consideration that a portion of the students enrolling will fall into either of these two categories. II. Goal: Ensure Quality and Accountability.Objective II.1: Increase the percentage of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College first time, full time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year in public postsecondary education by 40 percentage points from the fall, 2003 baseline level of 0%* to 40% by fall 2009. Louisiana: Vision 2020 Link: Objective 1.6.4 - Percentage of residents who have graduated from a two-year technical or community college. Strategy II.1.1: Implement campus-specific retention assessment systems. Strategy II.1.2: Expand availability of first-time student seminars and first-year experience courses. Strategy II.1.3: Expand academic and training support and resource centers. Strategy II.1.4: Continue periodic assessment of student services utilizing student opinion surveys. Strategy II.1.5: Expand efforts to encourage transfer from two-year colleges to four-year universities. Performance Indicators: Output: Percentage of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year in public postsecondary education. Outcome: Percentage point change in the percentage of first-time, L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College full-time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year in public postsecondary education. Output: Percentage of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year at the same institution (aggregated for the LCTC System). Outcome: Percentage point change in the percentage of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year at the same institution. Objective II.2: Increase the three-year graduation rate at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College colleges by 7 percentage points from the 2002-2003 academic year baseline level of 0%* to 7% by spring 2009. Louisiana: Vision 2020 Link: Objective 1.6.4 - Percentage of residents who have graduated from a two-year technical or community college. Strategy II.2.1: Promote dual and cross enrollment agreements with public school districts and among postsecondary institutions. Strategy II.2.2: Implement system campus-specific retention assessment systems. Performance Indicators: Output: Percentage of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College students identified in a first-time, full-time, degree-seeking cohort, graduating within three years from a public postsecondary institution. Outcome: Percentage point change in the graduation rate of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College students identified in a first-time, full-time, degree-seeking cohort, graduating within three years from a public postsecondary institution. In Compliance with Act 1465 of 1997, each strategic plan must include the following process: I. A brief statement identifying the principal clients and users of each program and the specific service or benefit derived by such persons or organizations: The Louisiana Community and Technical College System has authority over a very diverse group of colleges. The system is comprised of seven community colleges, two technical community colleges, and one Louisiana Technical College, with forty campuses across the state. The System has facilities and/or programs strategically placed throughout Louisiana's sixty-four parishes, to ensure the citizens of Louisiana access to postsecondary education. As a unique part of the LCTC System, L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College delivers services to students enrolled in a variety of technical and academic programs of not more than two years. These programs include, but are not limited to, occupational and technical fields, general education, continuing education, pre-technical preparatory, business and industry specific training, developmental studies, and other special training. Additionally, FTCC's stakeholders extend beyond students to include all citizens of the Tri-Parish Region who benefit from a healthy economy. Finally, as a College committed to being accountable to its stakeholders, the main clients and users of the College's programs are also citizens of Louisiana who contribute tax revenues to state, parish, and local governments and support postsecondary education in Louisiana. II. An identification of potential external factors that are beyond the control of the entity and that could significantly affect the achievement of its goals or objectives: A list of external factors that are beyond the control of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College that could significantly affect the achievement of its goals includes: 1. The Administration The current administration at FTCC is supportive of the goals and objectives of both the College and the System. The support for postsecondary education in general has been commendable. However, the governor of Louisiana is very influential and there is no guarantee that future administrations will be as supportive of the LCTC System and its member colleges. 2. The Economy At present, Louisiana's economy is relatively stable and becoming more diverse. However, even though the state's economy is not as vulnerable to downturns as it was in past decades, postsecondary education's financial position will always be precarious as long as it's funding is not guaranteed. An economic recession or depression would hit postsecondary education particularly hard, since its funding is not protected by either constitution or statute. 3. The Federal Government A significant amount of revenue flows from Washington D.C. into Louisiana public postsecondary education. A change in policy at the federal level can have dramatic affects on postsecondary education, including student financial aid, research and experimentation, telecommunications (distance learning), and related programs. III. The statutory requirement or other authority for each goal of the plan. I. Goal: Increase Opportunities for Student Access and Success. Constitution (Article VIII, Section 5 (D) 4) - To formulate and make timely revision of a master plan. Similar statutory language appears in Title 17 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. II. Goal: Ensure Quality and Accountability. Constitution (Article VIII,Section 5 (D) 4) - To formulate and make timely revision of a master plan. Similar statutory language appears in Title 17 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. 2. Constitution (Article VIII, Section 5 (D) 1,2) - To revise or eliminate existing academic programs and to approve or disapprove new program proposals. Similar statutory language appears in Title 17 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. 3. Constitution (Article VIII, Section 5 (D) 3) - To study the need for new institutions or change in mission of existing institutions. Similar statutory language appears in Title 17 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. IV. A description of any program evaluation used to develop objectives and strategies. The goals and objectives in this Revised Five-year Strategic Plan were derived in part from the LCTC System Strategic Plan, which was developed with the assistance of a consultant. Several existing external and internal strategic plans were reviewed. These plans include: The Board of Regents' Master Plan for Higher Education, the Governor's Vision 2020 Plan, the then-current LCTCS Strategic Plan as well as the plans of the system colleges. In addition, FTCC identified strategic directions for its future, which would allow for efficiency and effectiveness in addressing our roles as workforce training provider and the developer of human capital. The L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College Strategic Plan was developed by a group of individuals representing the Houma community, the faculty, and the staff of the College. It represents initiatives at the college level designed to support and enhance the LCTC System Strategic Plan as stated above. The FTCC plan went through a series of review and revision sessions with faculty, staff, and members of the Chancellor's Executive Team. V. Identification of the primary persons who will benefit from or be significantly affected by each objective within the plan. See Performance Indicator Documentation attached for each objective. VI. An explanation of how duplication of effort will be avoided when the operations of more than one program are directed at achieving a single goal, objective, or strategy. For the purposes of Act 1465 of 1997, the LCTC System is a single program. Duplication of effort of more than one program is thus not applicable. VII. Documentation as to the validity, reliability, and appropriateness of each performance indicator, as well as the method used to verify and validate the performance indicators as relevant measures of each program's performance. See Performance Indicator Documentation attached for each performance indicator. VIII. A description of how each performance indicator is used in management decision making and other agency processes. See Performance Indicator Documentation attached for each performance indicator. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DOCUMENTATIONProgram: L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College Increase fall 14th class day headcount enrollment at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College colleges by 93.6% from the fall 2003 baseline level of 630 to 1,220 by fall 2009. Indicator: Number of students enrolled (as of the 14th class day) at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College. 1. What is the type of the indicator? (Input? Output? Outcome? Efficiency? Quality? More than one type?) Output 2. What is the rationale for the indicator? (Why was this indicator selected?) Recognition of importance of Louisiana communities having educated citizens. 3. What is the source of the indicator? (Examples: internal log or database; external database or publication.) How reliable is the source? (For example, an external source may have a build-in bias or hidden agenda.) Data is submitted by L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College to the Board of Regents Statewide Student Profile System (SSPS) from their student data systems. 4. What is the frequency and timing of collection or reporting? (For example: Is the information gathered on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual, basis? How "old" is it when reported? Is it reported on a state fiscal year, federal fiscal year, calendar year, school year, or other basis?) The data is submitted three times annually, in the summer, fall, and spring. For this indicator, fall data (the national standard) will be used. The indicator will be reported at the end of the third quarter. This will allow time for collection, aggregation, and editing of the data. 5. How is the indicator calculated? Is this a standard calculation? (Provide the formula or other method used to calculate the indicator. If a nonstandard method is used, explain why. For example, highway death rate is the number of highway fatalities per 100,000,000 miles driven. This rate is a standard calculation used by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The standard method practiced nationwide for reporting headcount enrollment is as of the 14th class day of the semester (9th class day for quarter system). The Regents' SSPS is a unit record system where each enrolled student, regardless of course load, is counted. 6. Does the indicator contain jargon, acronyms, or unclear terms? If so, clarify or define them. Headcount enrollment refers to the actual number of students enrolled (as opposed to fulltime equivalent enrollment (FTE) which is calculated from the number of student credit hours enrolled divided by a fixed number). 7. Is the indicator an aggregate or disaggregate figure? (is it a sum of smaller parts or is it a part of a larger whole? Examples: If the indicator is a statewide figure, can it be broken down into region or parish? If the indicator represents one client group served by a program, can it be combined with indicators for other client groups in order to measure the total client population?) This indicator is the aggregate of all students enrolled in L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College as of the 14th class day of the fall semesters. 8. Who is responsible for data collection, analysis, and quality? L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College submits the SSPS data electronically to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents performs numerous edits and works with the campuses/systems to correct errors. When all campus submissions are complete, the Regents' staff builds a master file for SSPS. 9. Does the indicator have limitations or weaknesses (e.g., limited geographical coverage, lack of precision or timeliness, or high cost to collect or analyze)? If so, explain. Is the indicator a proxy or surrogate? Does the source of the data have a bias or agenda? No real weaknesses. The reader must understand that this indicator reflects headcount enrollment and is not the enrollment calculation used for funding or reimbursement calculations. 10. How will the indicator be used in management decision making and other agency processes? Enrollment drives many management decisions. The size of an institution's enrollment impacts scheduling, hiring, future planning, program demands, facilities management, etc. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DOCUMENTATIONProgram: L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College Increase fall 14th class day headcount enrollment at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College by 93.6% from the fall 2003 baseline level of 630 to 1,220 by fall 2009. Indicator: Percent change in the number of students enrolled (as of the 14th class day) at the L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College. 1. What is the type of the indicator? (Input? Output? Outcome? Efficiency? Quality? More than one type?) Outcome 2. What is the rationale for the indicator? (Why was this indicator selected?) Recognition of importance of Louisiana communities having educated citizens. 3. What is the source of the indicator? (Examples: internal log or database; external database or publication.) How reliable is the source? (For example, an external source may have a build-in bias or hidden agenda.) Data is submitted by L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College to the Board of Regents Statewide Student Profile System (SSPS) from their student data systems. 4. What is the frequency and timing of collection or reporting? (For example: Is the information gathered on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual, basis? How "old" is it when reported? Is it reported on a state fiscal year, federal fiscal year, calendar year, school year, or other basis?) The data is submitted three times annually, in the summer, fall, and spring. For this indicator, fall data (the national standard) will be used. The indicator will be reported at the end of the third quarter. This will allow time for collection, aggregation, and editing of the data. 5. How is the indicator calculated? Is this a standard calculation? (Provide the formula or other method used to calculate the indicator. If a nonstandard method is used, explain why. For example, highway death rate is the number of highway fatalities per 100,000,000 miles driven. This rate is a standard calculation used by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The standard method practiced nationwide for reporting headcount enrollment is as of the 14th class day of the semester. The Regents' SSPS is a unit record system where each enrolled student, regardless of course load, is counted. 6. Does the indicator contain jargon, acronyms, or unclear terms? If so, clarify or define them. Headcount enrollment refers to the actual number of students enrolled (as opposed to fulltime equivalent enrollment (FTE) which is calculated from the number of student credit hours enrolled divided by a fixed number). 7. Is the indicator an aggregate or disaggregate figure? (is it a sum of smaller parts or is it a part of a larger whole? Examples: If the indicator is a statewide figure, can it be broken down into region or parish? If the indicator represents one client group served by a program, can it be combined with indicators for other client groups in order to measure the total client population?) This indicator is the aggregate of all students enrolled in L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College as of the 14th class day of the fall semesters. 8. Who is responsible for data collection, analysis, and quality? L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College submits the SSPS data electronically to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents performs numerous edits and works with the campuses/systems to correct errors. When all campus submissions are complete, the Regents' staff builds a master file for SSPS. 9. Does the indicator have limitations or weaknesses (e.g., limited geographical coverage, lack of precision or timeliness, or high cost to collect or analyze)? If so, explain. Is the indicator a proxy or surrogate? Does the source of the data have a bias or agenda? No real weaknesses. The reader must understand that this indicator reflects headcount enrollment and is not the enrollment calculation used for funding or reimbursement calculations. 10. How will the indicator be used in management decision making and other agency processes? Enrollment drives many management decisions. The size of an institution's enrollment impacts scheduling, hiring, future planning, program demands, facilities management, etc. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DOCUMENTATIONProgram: L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College Increase fall 14th class day minority fall 14th class day headcount enrollment at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College by 85% from the fall 2003 baseline level of 176 to 326 by fall 2009. Note: For the purposes of this report, minority enrollment is defined as any reported race, other than the following: white; non-resident alien; or "refused to indicate." Students reported as "non-resident aliens" and "refused to indicate" will not be included in the minority counts. Minority enrollment projections have been adjusted in consideration that a portion of the students enrolling will fall into either of these two categories. Indicator: Number of minority students enrolled (as of the 14th class day) at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College. 1. What is the type of the indicator? (Input? Output? Outcome? Efficiency? Quality? More than one type?) Output 2. What is the rationale for the indicator? (Why was this indicator selected?) Recognition that Louisiana's minority participation remains under-represented in postsecondary education and that for Louisiana to move forward, all citizens must be prepared to participate in the state's economy. 3. What is the source of the indicator? (Examples: internal log or database; external database or publication.) How reliable is the source? (For example, an external source may have a build-in bias or hidden agenda.) Data is submitted by L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College to the Board of Regents Statewide Student Profile System (SSPS) from their student data systems. The LCTC System retrieves this information from the SSPS. 4. What is the frequency and timing of collection or reporting? (For example: Is the information gathered on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual, basis? How "old" is it when reported? Is it reported on a state fiscal year, federal fiscal year, calendar year, school year, or other basis?) The data are gathered three times annually, in the summer, fall and spring. For this indicator, fall data (the national standard) will be used. The indicator will be reported at the end of the third quarter. This will allow time for collection, aggregation, and editing of the data. 5. How is the indicator calculated? Is this a standard calculation? (Provide the formula or other method used to calculate the indicator. If a nonstandard method is used, explain why. For example, highway death rate is the number of highway fatalities per 100,000,000 miles driven. This rate is a standard calculation used by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. For purposes of this Revised Strategic Plan, minority is defined as non-white. Any student who is reported as having any other ethnicity code than white will be included in the calculation of minority. The only exceptions are that non-resident aliens and refused to indicate are not included. As is the case in any enrollment calculation, headcount enrollment is as of the 14th class day of the semester. The Regents' SSPS is a unit record system where each enrolled student, regardless of course load, is counted. 6. Does the indicator contain jargon, acronyms, or unclear terms? If so, clarify or define them. Although not jargon, for purposes of this document, minority is defined as non-white and excludes non-resident aliens and students that refused to indicate a race. 7. Is the indicator an aggregate or disaggregate figure? (is it a sum of smaller parts or is it a part of a larger whole? Examples: If the indicator is a statewide figure, can it be broken down into region or parish? If the indicator represents one client group served by a program, can it be combined with indicators for other client groups in order to measure the total client population?) This indicator is the aggregate of all students enrolled in L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College as of the 14th class day of the fall semesters. 8. Who is responsible for data collection, analysis, and quality? L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College submits the SSPS data electronically to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents performs numerous edits and works with the campuses/systems to correct errors. When all campus submissions are complete, the Regents' staff builds a master file for SSPS. 9. Does the indicator have limitations or weaknesses (e.g., limited geographical coverage, lack of precision or timeliness, or high cost to collect or analyze)? If so, explain. Is the indicator a proxy or surrogate? Does the source of the data have a bias or agenda? No real weaknesses. The reader must understand that this indicator reflects minority headcount enrollment and is not the enrollment calculation used for funding or reimbursement calculations. The reader must also understand that minority is defined as non-white and excludes non-resident aliens and those students that refused to indicate a race. 10. How will the indicator be used in management decision making and other agency processes? L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College remains committed to the premise that a diverse student body is advantageous for the students, the institution, the system, and the state. The objective of increasing minority enrollment in postsecondary education can cause many decisions to change on campus, from recruitment strategies to student services, from hiring strategies to course offerings. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DOCUMENTATIONProgram: L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College Increase fall 14th class day minority fall 14th class day headcount enrollment at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College by 85% from the fall 2003 baseline level of 176 to 326 by fall 2009. Note: For the purposes of this report, minority enrollment is defined as any reported race, other than the following: white; non-resident alien; or "refused to indicate." Students reported as "non-resident aliens" and "refused to indicate" will not be included in the minority counts. Minority enrollment projections have been adjusted in consideration that a portion of the students enrolling will fall into either of these two categories. Indicator: Percent change in the number of minority students enrolled (as of the 14th class day) in L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College. 1. What is the type of the indicator? (Input? Output? Outcome? Efficiency? Quality? More than one type?) Outcome 2. What is the rationale for the indicator? (Why was this indicator selected?) Recognition that Louisiana's minority participation remains under-represented in postsecondary education and that for Louisiana to move forward, all citizens must be prepared to participate in the state's economy. 3. What is the source of the indicator? (Examples: internal log or database; external database or publication.) How reliable is the source? (For example, an external source may have a build-in bias or hidden agenda.) Data is submitted by L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College to the Board of Regents Statewide Student Profile System (SSPS) from their student data systems. The LCTC System retrieves this information from the SSPS. 4. What is the frequency and timing of collection or reporting? (For example: Is the information gathered on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual, basis? How "old" is it when reported? Is it reported on a state fiscal year, federal fiscal year, calendar year, school year, or other basis?) The data are gathered three times annually, in the summer, fall and spring. For this indicator, fall data (the national standard) will be used. The indicator will be reported at the end of the third quarter. This will allow time for collection, aggregation, and editing of the data. 5. How is the indicator calculated? Is this a standard calculation? (Provide the formula or other method used to calculate the indicator. If a nonstandard method is used, explain why. For example, highway death rate is the number of highway fatalities per 100,000,000 miles driven. This rate is a standard calculation used by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. For purposes of this Revised Strategic Plan, minority is defined as non-white. Any student who is reported as having any other ethnicity code than white will be included in the calculation of minority. The only exceptions are that non-resident aliens and refused to indicate are not included. As is the case in any enrollment calculation, headcount enrollment is as of the 14th class day of the semester. The Regents' SSPS is a unit record system where each enrolled student, regardless of course load, is counted. 6. Does the indicator contain jargon, acronyms, or unclear terms? If so, clarify or define them. Although not jargon, for purposes of this document, minority is defined as non-white and excludes non-resident aliens and students that refused to indicate a race. 7. Is the indicator an aggregate or disaggregate figure? (is it a sum of smaller parts or is it a part of a larger whole? Examples: If the indicator is a statewide figure, can it be broken down into region or parish? If the indicator represents one client group served by a program, can it be combined with indicators for other client groups in order to measure the total client population?) This indicator is the aggregate of all students enrolled in L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College as of the 14th class day of the fall semesters. 8. Who is responsible for data collection, analysis, and quality? L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College submits the SSPS data electronically to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents performs numerous edits and works with the campuses/systems to correct errors. When all campus submissions are complete, the Regents' staff builds a master file for SSPS. 9. Does the indicator have limitations or weaknesses (e.g., limited geographical coverage, lack of precision or timeliness, or high cost to collect or analyze)? If so, explain. Is the indicator a proxy or surrogate? Does the source of the data have a bias or agenda? No real weaknesses. The reader must understand that this indicator reflects minority headcount enrollment and is not the enrollment calculation used for funding or reimbursement calculations. The reader must also understand that minority is defined as non-white and excludes non-resident aliens and those students that refused to indicate a race. 10. How will the indicator be used in management decision making and other agency processes? L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College remains committed to the premise that a diverse student body is advantageous for the students, the institution, the system, and the state. The objective of increasing minority enrollment in postsecondary education can cause many decisions to change on campus, from recruitment strategies to student services, from hiring strategies to course offerings. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DOCUMENTATIONProgram: L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College Increase the percentage of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College first time, full time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year in public postsecondary education by 40 percentage points from the fall, 2003 baseline level of 0%* to 40% by fall 2009. Indicator: Percentage of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to second year in L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College. 1. What is the type of the indicator? (Input? Output? Outcome? Efficiency? Quality? More than one type?) Output 2. What is the rationale for the indicator? (Why was this indicator selected?) L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College is committed not only to recruiting and enrolling students, but also to retaining them in postsecondary education, thus preparing them for more productive lives. 3. What is the source of the indicator? (Examples: internal log or database; external database or publication.) How reliable is the source? (For example, an external source may have a build-in bias or hidden agenda.) Data is submitted by L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College to the Board of Regents Statewide Student Profile System (SSPS) from their student data systems. The LCTC System retrieves this information from the SSPS. 4. What is the frequency and timing of collection or reporting? (For example: Is the information gathered on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual, basis? How "old" is it when reported? Is it reported on a state fiscal year, federal fiscal year, calendar year, school year, or other basis?) The data are gathered three times annually, in the summer, fall, and spring. For this indicator, fall semester data from the previous year and the current year will be used. The indicator will be reported at the end of the third quarter. This will allow time for collection, aggregation, and editing of the data. 5. How is the indicator calculated? Is this a standard calculation? (Provide the formula or other method used to calculate the indicator. If a nonstandard method is used, explain why. For example, highway death rate is the number of highway fatalities per 100,000,000 miles driven. This rate is a standard calculation used by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The standard method practiced nationwide for reporting headcount enrollment is as of the 14th class day of the semester. The Regents' SSPS is a unit record system where each enrolled student, regardless of course load, is counted. The retention percentage is calculated by using the institutionally defined cohort of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen in a given fall, and tracking them the following fall for re-enrollment. The number of students found re-enrolled is divided by the cohort to obtain the retention percentage. 6. Does the indicator contain jargon, acronyms, or unclear terms? If so, clarify or define them. A cohort is defined as a specific group (of students) established for tracking purposes. 7. Is the indicator an aggregate or disaggregate figure? (is it a sum of smaller parts or is it a part of a larger whole? Examples: If the indicator is a statewide figure, can it be broken down into region or parish? If the indicator represents one client group served by a program, can it be combined with indicators for other client groups in order to measure the total client population?) This indicator is the percentage of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen who are enrolled in L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College as of the 14th class day of the fall semesters. 8. Who is responsible for data collection, analysis, and quality? L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College submits the SSPS data electronically to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents performs numerous edits and works with the campuses/systems to correct errors. When all campus submissions are complete, the Regents' staff builds a master file for SSPS. 9. Does the indicator have limitations or weaknesses (e.g., limited geographical coverage, lack of precision or timeliness, or high cost to collect or analyze)? If so, explain. Is the indicator a proxy or surrogate? Does the source of the data have a bias or agenda? This indicator reflects a percentage of enrollment and changes in headcount enrollment, and is not the enrollment calculations used for funding or reimbursement calculations. It does not take into account the mission of the technical community college which includes helping students acquire job skills to be able to enter or return to the job market as quickly as possible with enhanced capabilities and technical skill. 10. How will the indicator be used in management decision making and other agency processes? Retention in postsecondary education impacts many decisions. Student retention has impacts on financial aid, course offerings, seminars, graduation processes, faculty distribution, etc. Retention also impacts the overall size of an institution. The size of an institution's enrollment impacts scheduling, hiring, future planning, and program demands, facilities management, etc. Any significant changes in enrollment can impact all the areas listed above. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DOCUMENTATIONProgram: L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College Increase the percentage of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College first time, full time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year in public postsecondary education by 40 percentage points from the fall, 2003 baseline level of 0%* to 40% by fall 2009. Indicator: Percentage point change in the percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year in L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College. 1. What is the type of the indicator? (Input? Output? Outcome? Efficiency? Quality? More than one type?) Outcome 2. What is the rationale for the indicator? (Why was this indicator selected?) L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College is committed not only to recruiting and enrolling students, but also to retaining them in postsecondary education, thus preparing them for more productive lives. 3. What is the source of the indicator? (Examples: internal log or database; external database or publication.) How reliable is the source? (For example, an external source may have a build-in bias or hidden agenda.) Data is submitted by L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College to the Board of Regents Statewide Student Profile System (SSPS) from their student data systems. The LCTC System retrieves this information from the SSPS. 4. What is the frequency and timing of collection or reporting? (For example: Is the information gathered on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual, basis? How "old" is it when reported? Is it reported on a state fiscal year, federal fiscal year, calendar year, school year, or other basis?) The data are gathered three times annually, in the summer, fall, and spring. For this indicator, fall semester data from the previous year and the current year will be used. The indicator will be reported at the end of the third quarter. This will allow time for collection, aggregation, and editing of the data. 5. How is the indicator calculated? Is this a standard calculation? (Provide the formula or other method used to calculate the indicator. If a nonstandard method is used, explain why. For example, highway death rate is the number of highway fatalities per 100,000,000 miles driven. This rate is a standard calculation used by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The standard method practiced nationwide for reporting headcount enrollment is as of the 14th class day of the semester. The Regents' SSPS is a unit record system where each enrolled student, regardless of course load, is counted. The retention percentage is calculated by using the institutionally defined cohort of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen in a given fall, and tracking them the following fall for re-enrollment. The number of students found re-enrolled is divided by the cohort to obtain the retention percentage. 6. Does the indicator contain jargon, acronyms, or unclear terms? If so, clarify or define them. A cohort is defined as a specific group (of students)
established for tracking purposes 7. Is the indicator an aggregate or disaggregate figure? (is it a sum of smaller parts or is it a part of a larger whole? Examples: If the indicator is a statewide figure, can it be broken down into region or parish? If the indicator represents one client group served by a program, can it be combined with indicators for other client groups in order to measure the total client population?) This indicator is the difference in the percentage points of first time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen enrolled in L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College as of the 14th class day of the fall semester. 8. Who is responsible for data collection, analysis, and quality? L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College submits the SSPS data electronically to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents performs numerous edits and works with the campuses/systems to correct errors. When all campus submissions are complete, the Regents' staff builds a master file for SSPS. 9. Does the indicator have limitations or weaknesses (e.g., limited geographical coverage, lack of precision or timeliness, or high cost to collect or analyze)? If so, explain. Is the indicator a proxy or surrogate? Does the source of the data have a bias or agenda? This indicator reflects a percentage of enrollment and changes in headcount enrollment, and is not the enrollment calculations used for funding or reimbursement calculations. It does not take into account the mission of the technical community college which includes helping students acquire job skills to be able to enter or return to the job market as quickly as possible with enhanced capabilities and technical skill. 10. How will the indicator be used in management decision making and other agency processes? Retention in postsecondary education impacts many decisions. Student retention has impacts on financial aid, course offerings, seminars, graduation processes, faculty distribution, etc. Retention also impacts the overall size of an institution. The size of an institution's enrollment impacts scheduling, hiring, future planning, and program demands, facilities management, etc. Any significant changes in enrollment can impact all the areas listed above. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DOCUMENTATIONProgram: L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College Increase the percentage of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College first time, full time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year in public postsecondary education by 40 percentage points from the fall, 2003 baseline level of 0%* to 40% by fall 2009. Indicator: Percentage of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to second year at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College. 1. What is the type of the indicator? (Input? Output? Outcome? Efficiency? Quality? More than one type?) Output 2. What is the rationale for the indicator? (Why was this indicator selected?) The LCTC System and its colleges must be committed not only to recruiting and enrolling students, but also retaining the students at their respective college, thus preparing them for more productive lives. 3. What is the source of the indicator? (Examples: internal log or database; external database or publication.) How reliable is the source? (For example, an external source may have a build-in bias or hidden agenda.) Data is submitted by L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College to the Board of Regents Statewide Student Profile System (SSPS) from their student data systems. The LCTC System retrieves this information from the SSPS. 4. What is the frequency and timing of collection or reporting? (For example: Is the information gathered on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual, basis? How "old" is it when reported? Is it reported on a state fiscal year, federal fiscal year, calendar year, school year, or other basis?) The data are gathered three times annually, in the summer, fall, and spring. For this indicator, fall semester data from the previous year and the current year will be used. The indicator will be reported at the end of the third quarter. This will allow time for collection, aggregation, and editing of the data. 5. How is the indicator calculated? Is this a standard calculation? (Provide the formula or other method used to calculate the indicator. If a nonstandard method is used, explain why. For example, highway death rate is the number of highway fatalities per 100,000,000 miles driven. This rate is a standard calculation used by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The standard method practiced nationwide for reporting headcount enrollment is as of the 14th class day of the semester. The Regents' SSPS is a unit record system where each enrolled student, regardless of course load, is counted. The retention percentage is calculated by using the institutionally defined cohort of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen in a given fall, and tracking them the following fall for re-enrollment. The number of students found re-enrolled is divided by the cohort to obtain the retention percentage. 6. Does the indicator contain jargon, acronyms, or unclear terms? If so, clarify or define them. A cohort is defined as a specific group (of students)
established for tracking purposes 7. Is the indicator an aggregate or disaggregate figure? (is it a sum of smaller parts or is it a part of a larger whole? Examples: If the indicator is a statewide figure, can it be broken down into region or parish? If the indicator represents one client group served by a program, can it be combined with indicators for other client groups in order to measure the total client population?) This indicator is a percentage of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen enrolled in L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College as of the 14th class day of the fall semester tracked the following fall for re-enrollment. The number of students found re-enrolled at their same institution is divided by the cohort to obtain the retention percentage. 8. Who is responsible for data collection, analysis, and quality? L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College submits the SSPS data electronically to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents performs numerous edits and works with the campuses/systems to correct errors. When all campus submissions are complete, the Regents' staff builds a master file for SSPS. 9. Does the indicator have limitations or weaknesses (e.g., limited geographical coverage, lack of precision or timeliness, or high cost to collect or analyze)? If so, explain. Is the indicator a proxy or surrogate? Does the source of the data have a bias or agenda? This indicator reflects a percentage of enrollment and changes in headcount enrollment, and is not the enrollment calculations used for funding or reimbursement calculations. It does not take into account the mission of the technical community college which includes helping students acquire job skills to be able to enter or return to the job market as quickly as possible with enhanced capabilities and technical skill. 10. How will the indicator be used in management decision making and other agency processes? Retention in postsecondary education impacts many decisions. Student retention has impacts on financial aid, course offerings, seminars, graduation processes, faculty distribution, etc. Retention also impacts the overall size of an institution. The size of an institution's enrollment impacts scheduling, hiring, future planning, and program demands, facilities management, etc. Any significant changes in enrollment can impact all the areas listed above. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DOCUMENTATIONProgram: L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College Increase the percentage of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College first time, full time, degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year in public postsecondary education by 40 percentage points from the fall, 2003 baseline level of 0%* to 40% by fall 2009. Indicator: Percentage point change in the percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking freshmen retained to the second year at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College. 1. What is the type of the indicator? (Input? Output? Outcome? Efficiency? Quality? More than one type?) Outcome 2. What is the rationale for the indicator? (Why was this indicator selected?) L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College is committed not only to recruiting and enrolling students, but also retaining the students at their respective college, thus preparing them for more productive lives. 3. What is the source of the indicator? (Examples: internal log or database; external database or publication.) How reliable is the source? (For example, an external source may have a build-in bias or hidden agenda.) Data is submitted by L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College to the Board of Regents Statewide Student Profile System (SSPS) from their student data systems. The LCTC System retrieves this information from the SSPS. 4. What is the frequency and timing of collection or reporting? (For example: Is the information gathered on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual, basis? How "old" is it when reported? Is it reported on a state fiscal year, federal fiscal year, calendar year, school year, or other basis?) The data are gathered three times annually, in the summer, fall, and spring. For this indicator, fall semester data from the previous year and the current year will be used. The indicator will be reported at the end of the third quarter. This will allow time for collection, aggregation, and editing of the data. 5. How is the indicator calculated? Is this a standard calculation? (Provide the formula or other method used to calculate the indicator. If a nonstandard method is used, explain why. For example, highway death rate is the number of highway fatalities per 100,000,000 miles driven. This rate is a standard calculation used by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The standard method practiced nationwide for reporting headcount enrollment is as of the 14th class day of the semester. The Regents' SSPS is a unit record system where each enrolled student, regardless of course load, is counted. The retention percentage is calculated by using the institutionally defined cohort of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen in a given fall, and tracking them the following fall for re-enrollment. The number of students found re-enrolled is divided by the cohort to obtain the retention percentage. 6. Does the indicator contain jargon, acronyms, or unclear terms? If so, clarify or define them. A cohort is defined as a specific group (of students)
established for tracking purposes 7. Is the indicator an aggregate or disaggregate figure? (is it a sum of smaller parts or is it a part of a larger whole? Examples: If the indicator is a statewide figure, can it be broken down into region or parish? If the indicator represents one client group served by a program, can it be combined with indicators for other client groups in order to measure the total client population?) This indicator is the difference in the percentage points of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen who enrolled in L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College as of the 14th class day of the fall semester and returned to FTCC the following fall semester as of the 14th class day. 8. Who is responsible for data collection, analysis, and quality? L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College submits the SSPS data electronically to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents performs numerous edits and works with the campuses/systems to correct errors. When all campus submissions are complete, the Regents' staff builds a master file for SSPS. 9. Does the indicator have limitations or weaknesses (e.g., limited geographical coverage, lack of precision or timeliness, or high cost to collect or analyze)? If so, explain. Is the indicator a proxy or surrogate? Does the source of the data have a bias or agenda? This indicator reflects a percentage of enrollment and changes in headcount enrollment, and is not the enrollment calculations used for funding or reimbursement calculations. It does not take into account the mission of the technical community college which includes helping students acquire job skills to be able to enter or return to the job market as quickly as possible with enhanced capabilities and technical skill. 10. How will the indicator be used in management decision making and other agency processes? Retention in postsecondary education impacts many decisions. Student retention has impacts on financial aid, course offerings, seminars, graduation processes, faculty distribution, etc. Retention also impacts the overall size of an institution. The size of an institution's enrollment impacts scheduling, hiring, future planning, and program demands, facilities management, etc. Any significant changes in enrollment can impact all the areas listed above. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DOCUMENTATIONProgram: L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College Increase the three-year graduation rate at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College by 7 percentage points from the 2002-2003 academic year baseline level of 0% to 7% by spring 2009. Indicator: Percentage of L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College students identified in a first-time, full-time, degree-seeking cohort, graduating within three years from a public post-secondary institution. 1. What is the type of the indicator? (Input? Output? Outcome? Efficiency? Quality? More than one type?) Output 2. What is the rationale for the indicator? (Why was this indicator selected?) Graduation rates for L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College are low. It is important for the further development of the state's economy that a higher percentage of students who enroll in college with the intention of earning a degree obtain that degree. Louisiana's institutions have been making strides in this area, but more improvement is needed. 3. What is the source of the indicator? (Examples: internal log or database; external database or publication.) How reliable is the source? (For example, an external source may have a build-in bias or hidden agenda.) The source of the data is the Board of Regents' Statewide Student Profile System to identify the first-time, full-time, degree-seeking cohort and the Regents' Completers System for graduates. The state and its institutions will follow the new protocol as established by the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) which accounts for students who transfer to other public campuses in the state and subsequently graduate within 3 years to be included in the graduation rate calculation. 4. What is the frequency and timing of collection or reporting? (For example: Is the information gathered on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual, basis? How "old" is it when reported? Is it reported on a state fiscal year, federal fiscal year, calendar year, school year, or other basis?) The student cohort data includes those first-time, full-time, degree-seeking students who entered a two-year institution three years earlier and tracks how many and what percentage graduated (either from the original institution or another public institution in Louisiana). 5. How is the indicator calculated? Is this a standard calculation? (Provide the formula or other method used to calculate the indicator. If a nonstandard method is used, explain why. For example, highway death rate is the number of highway fatalities per 100,000,000 miles driven. This rate is a standard calculation used by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The graduation rate for two-year institutions is calculated by identifying the cohort of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen, and tracking them for three years. The number of students that graduate is divided by the original cohort to obtain the graduation rate. 6. Does the indicator contain jargon, acronyms, or unclear terms? If so, clarify or define them. A cohort is defined as a specific group (of students)
established for tracking purposes 7. Is the indicator an aggregate or disaggregate figure? (is it a sum of smaller parts or is it a part of a larger whole? Examples: If the indicator is a statewide figure, can it be broken down into region or parish? If the indicator represents one client group served by a program, can it be combined with indicators for other client groups in order to measure the total client population?) This indicator is the percentage of first-time, full-time degree-seeking freshmen who enrolled in L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College one fall semester as of the 14th day and graduated from a public post-secondary institution in Louisiana three years later. 8. Who is responsible for data collection, analysis, and quality? The Board of Regents is the statewide coordinator for student data. Because graduation data is not limited to the institution at which the student originally enrolled, the LCTC System and its colleges will obtain this information from the Board of Regents. L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College submits enrollment and completer data electronically to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents performs numerous edits and works with the campuses/systems to correct errors. 9. Does the indicator have limitations or weaknesses (e.g., limited geographical coverage, lack of precision or timeliness, or high cost to collect or analyze)? If so, explain. Is the indicator a proxy or surrogate? Does the source of the data have a bias or agenda? The reader must understand that this indicator is based on tracking a cohort of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen for three years. It is not a graduation rate for all students enrolled at an institution. 10. How will the indicator be used in management decision making and other agency processes? Institutions must improve graduation rates. Additional campus resources should be allocated to programs that target improved rates. Improved advising, better scheduling, career counseling, and an increase in articulation agreements will all contribute to improved graduation rates. Implementation of admissions criteria at the four-year campuses will result in a better match between campus and student, resulting in improved graduation rates. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DOCUMENTATIONProgram: L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College Increase the three-year graduation rate at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College by 7 percentage points from the 2002-2003 academic year baseline level of 0% to 7% by spring 2009. Indicator: Percentage point change in the graduation rate of LCTC System students identified in a first-time, full-time, degree-seeking cohort, graduating within three years from a public postsecondary institution. 1. What is the type of the indicator? (Input? Output? Outcome? Efficiency? Quality? More than one type?) Outcome 2. What is the rationale for the indicator? (Why was this indicator selected?) Graduation rates for L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College are low. It is important for the further development of the state's economy that a higher percentage of students who enroll in college with the intention of earning a degree obtain that degree. Louisiana's institutions have been making strides in this area, but more improvement is needed. 3. What is the source of the indicator? (Examples: internal log or database; external database or publication.) How reliable is the source? (For example, an external source may have a build-in bias or hidden agenda.) The source of the data is the Board of Regents' Statewide Student Profile System to identify the first-time, full-time, degree-seeking cohort and the Regents' Completers System for graduates. The state and its institutions will follow the new protocol as established by the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) which accounts for students who transfer to other public campuses in the state and subsequently graduate within 3 years to be included in the graduation rate calculation. 4. What is the frequency and timing of collection or reporting? (For example: Is the information gathered on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual, basis? How "old" is it when reported? Is it reported on a state fiscal year, federal fiscal year, calendar year, school year, or other basis?) The student cohort data includes those first-time, full-time, degree-seeking students who entered a two-year institution three years earlier and tracks how many and what percentage graduated (either from the original institution or another public institution in Louisiana). 5. How is the indicator calculated? Is this a standard calculation? (Provide the formula or other method used to calculate the indicator. If a nonstandard method is used, explain why. For example, highway death rate is the number of highway fatalities per 100,000,000 miles driven. This rate is a standard calculation used by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The graduation rate for two-year institutions is calculated by identifying the cohort of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen, and tracking them for three years. The number of students that graduate is divided by the original cohort to obtain the graduation rate. 6. Does the indicator contain jargon, acronyms, or unclear terms? If so, clarify or define them. A cohort is defined as a specific group (of students)
established for tracking purposes 7. Is the indicator an aggregate or disaggregate figure? (is it a sum of smaller parts or is it a part of a larger whole? Examples: If the indicator is a statewide figure, can it be broken down into region or parish? If the indicator represents one client group served by a program, can it be combined with indicators for other client groups in order to measure the total client population?) The LCTC System will report the aggregated number of graduates from the designated LCTC System cohort of students (identified as originally enrolled at an LCTC System college). This indicator is the difference in percentage points from year to year of the first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen who enrolled at L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College as of the 14th class day of one fall semester and graduated from a public post-secondary institution in Louisiana three years later. 8. Who is responsible for data collection, analysis, and quality? The Board of Regents is the statewide coordinator for student data. Because graduation data is not limited to the institution at which the student originally enrolled, the LCTC System and its colleges will obtain this information from the Board of Regents. L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College submits enrollment and completer data electronically to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents performs numerous edits and works with the campuses/systems to correct errors. 9. Does the indicator have limitations or weaknesses (e.g., limited geographical coverage, lack of precision or timeliness, or high cost to collect or analyze)? If so, explain. Is the indicator a proxy or surrogate? Does the source of the data have a bias or agenda? The reader must understand that this indicator is based on tracking a cohort of first-time, full-time, degree-seeking freshmen for three years. It is not a graduation rate for all students enrolled at an institution. 10. How will the indicator be used in management decision making and other agency processes? Institutions must improve graduation rates. Additional campus resources should be allocated to programs that target improved rates. Improved advising, better scheduling, career counseling, and an increase in articulation agreements will all contribute to improved graduation rates. Implementation of admissions criteria at the four-year campuses will result in a better match between campus and student, resulting in improved graduation rates. *L. E. Fletcher Technical Community College will report retention rates and graduation rates for those first-time full-time students identified as pursuing an associate degree (of 2 years in length) that began in Fall 2003. Prior to Fall 2003, FTCC was included in the LTC and retention/graduation rates were not available for individual campuses. |